David Cannon/Getty Images
A plaque at Augusta National, dedicated to Arnold Palmer's accomplishments at The Masters.
This is a case far removed from the circumstances of Juli Inkster.
Palmer arguably benefited from the times he lived in, because this rules upheaval would definitely not swing in his favor today.
ESPN.com's Bob Harig aided the resurfacing of this controversy in his 2008 piece, and it still remains captivating even though it happened over 54 years ago.
At the 1958 Masters Tournament–The King's first major victory–Palmer was paired with Ken Venturi in the final round.
In the heat of Amen Corner, Palmer's tee shot on the par-3 12th hole plugged just over the back of the green.
After consulting his playing partner, Palmer concluded he was entitled to relief. Rules official Arthur Lacey had other ideas and demanded that Palmer play the ball as it lied.
Palmer chopped at the embedded ball and it barely moved. He went on to make a double bogey on the hole.
Then something strange happened.
Dissapointed by the ruling he received, Palmer declared a second ball. He took a drop from where his original tee shot plugged, and got up and down for a par.
The ruling was revisted by officials on the 15th hole, and it went in Palmer's favor.
That par, along with an eagle at No. 13 turned out to be just enough momentum for Palmer to win by one stroke.