2012 NBA Draft: 5 Reasons Cavaliers Need to Avoid Taking Andre Drummond

By (Featured Columnist) on June 22, 2012

3,303 reads

35Icon_comment

Previous
1 of 7
Next
138020037_crop_650x440
Elsa/Getty Images

Coming off another disappointing season topped off with a certain former Cavalier hoisting trophies, the time is now for the Cavaliers to nail down their future with a home run 2012 NBA draft class.

The Cavaliers began to lay the blueprint for a championship contender in last year's draft with the addition of Tristan Thompson and Rookie of the Year Kyrie Irving.

This year's draft may be even more important, however.

The Cavaliers currently own pick Nos. 4, 24, 33 and 34 in a loaded class that should help them take the next big step in returning to prominence, should they make the right selections.

Let's focus on the big one, the fourth overall pick.

Assuming the Cavaliers keep it, they will likely have their choice among Thomas Robinson, Bradley Beal, Harrison Barnes, Michael Kidd-Gilchrist and Andre Drummond.

While all represent tremendous upside, only one has extreme bust potential.

Here are the top five reasons the Cavaliers need to stay far, far away from Drummond.

5. Lack of Offense

137892426_display_image
Elsa/Getty Images

Being possibly the most heralded center prospect in the draft since Greg Oden back in 2007, you would think Drummond would already have a solid offensive game.

If he does, he certainly did a good job of hiding it during his time at UConn. 

When asked about his offensive skill set, or lack thereof, instead of defending himself Drummond stated in an interview with HoopsWorld; “I don’t have a back-to-the-basket game, honestly speaking,”

Shouldn't a center going in the top five picks have a back-to-the-basket game?  Yikes.

4. Poor Fit with Cavaliers

136372326_display_image
Mike Lawrie/Getty Images

On paper, one would say Andre Drummond and the Cavaliers would be a a great fit due to their need for a center.

Looking deeper, however, the fit would actually be quite poor.

With Antawn Jamison leaving, the Cavaliers will almost certainly begin the 2012-2013 season with Tristan Thompson as their starting power forward. 

The soon to be second year man out of Texas is a great athlete, defender and rebounder, but doesn't have much of an offensive game at this point.  If placed next to an offensive-minded center, his offensive deficiencies could be overlooked more easily.

Placed next to Drummond, however, you have two young, offensively-inept projects learning on the fly together.  It could get very, very ugly.

3. Free-Throw Shooting

141003398_display_image
Jim McIsaac/Getty Images

In his lone season with the Huskies, Drummond stepped up and attempted 88 free throws.

The problem with this number is that he only converted 26 of them, coming in at a putrid 29.5 percent.

For comparison, Shaquille O'Neal still managed to make 52.7 percent of his free throws for his career, one in which he was constantly criticized for stinkin' it up at the line.

That's right, Shaq made nearly double the amount of free throws that Drummond made.

While there's no doubt he should improve on that number as he progresses, it would be surprising to see him become anything more than a poor-average shooter, something that NBA teams will take advantage of and that may force his team to keep him out of the game during crucial times due to a potential "Hack-a-Andre".

2. Lack of Motor and Work Ethic

132353165_display_image
Jim Rogash/Getty Images

While Tristan Thompson and Drummond have a similar skill set, Thompson is expected to make significant strides due to his high work ethic and motor.

A major knock against Drummond has been his lack of these characteristics, as he often disappeared during games and didn't seem to give 100 percent while on the court.

According to Alex Kennedy of HoopsWorld, "throughout high school and college, his consistency and motor have been a constant concern. The game has always come easy to him, and his work ethic has been questioned in recent years."

Few things in sports are worse than seeing an athlete loaded with talent fail to live up to expectations due to laziness or a poor work ethic.

Drummond could easily go down that path.

1. Better Options Available

141790432_display_image
Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images

Drummond has enough upside and defensive ability right now to warrant a high pick, but not higher than this draft's other stars.

Cleveland would be much better off with a safer prospect on the wing like Beal, Kidd-Gilchrist or even Barnes.  I would even prefer Thomas Robinson due to his premier offensive game and rebounding.

The bottom line is, Drummond is just too risky of a pick for a rebuilding team like Cleveland to make. 

They are in a prime position to add a scorer and playmaker, one that they desperately need, and shouldn't pick a project like Drummond and cross their fingers hoping he'll work out.

Begin Slideshow
Keep Reading
Flag
Props (0)
This article is

What is the duplicate article?

Why is this article offensive?

Where is this article plagiarized from?

Why is this article poorly edited?

Flag This Article
Cleveland Cavaliers Cleveland Cavaliers: Like this team?
Default-user-icon-comment
or to post a comment

35 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment
Big
Loading comments...
just now posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

Follow the Cleveland Cavaliers from B/R on Facebook

Follow the Cleveland Cavaliers from B/R on Facebook and get the latest updates straight to your newsfeed!

Fans of

Icon_subscribe
Icon_youtube
Icon_google
Cleveland Cavaliers

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address

Thanks for signing up.

We're Scouting Top Writers

Report Card Grades for Every NBA Superstar Hint: you can use arrow keys to navigate through this channel.