Roger Clemens Trail: Jury Finds Legendary Pitcher Not Guilty of Perjury
The charges stemmed from alleged lies Clemens told congress under oath regarding the use of performance-enhancing drugs.
ESPN's T.J. Quinn passed along the verdict.
#Clemens NOT GUILTY, ALL COUNTS— T.J. Quinn (@TJQuinnESPN) June 18, 2012
To find Clemens guilty of these obstruction charges, jurors would have had to unanimously concur that at least one of his 13 statements in question for this trial was false or misleading. Obviously, this did not happen.
This has been a lengthy process. It all began with a congressional hearing in 2008 where Clemens denied taking illegal performance enhancers. His testimony was contradicted by the testimony of others, most notably his former trainer Brian McNamee and former teammate Andy Pettitte.
The second trial took significantly longer, with 40 witnesses being heard from in total. Given all of that testimony, it is not shocking that two jurors were dismissed for falling asleep during the proceedings.
While it is understandable that congress would do all it could to reinforce the severity of perjury, the incredible devotion to find out if Clemens was cheating has ultimately proven to be a waste of resources.
However, with the conclusion of this trial, we are one step closer to closing the book on an incredibly tainted era in professional baseball.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?