Indiana Pacers

NBA Playoffs 2012: The Indiana Pacers Did Not Choke; What They Did Was Worse

Hill gets beat, Hibbert rotates, Nelson finds open teammate.  Repeat as needed to assure Magic victory.
Hill gets beat, Hibbert rotates, Nelson finds open teammate. Repeat as needed to assure Magic victory.Gregory Shamus/Getty Images
Percy DinozoCorrespondent IApril 30, 2012

Local reporters such as the Indianapolis Star's Bob Kravitz are labeling the Pacers' Game 1 loss as a choke, but this is far from the truth.

Choking implies that the team gave away the game in the closing moments.

What the Pacers did was give away the game bit by bit from the opening tip: The Pacers lost the game because they were beat at the point guard position multiple times throughout the game.

If you are a Pacers fan, and I were to tell you before the game that your All-Star center, Roy Hibbert, would near a triple-double while recording nine blocks, you would likely be very excited.

You would now know that this silver lining of course encircles a very dark cloud.

Why did Hibbert even need to block nine shots, anyways? 

Typically, when a center blocks a shot, it is because someone from the other team has penetrated into the paint for an open look, and the center is rotating over in help defense.

Most of Hibbert's blocks came in just that scenario: Some came against Jameer Nelson, others came against whomever Nelson found for what appeared to be an easy layup.

The Pacers guards—George Hill in particular—should be falling over themselves to buy Hibbert dinner after he cleaned up their mistakes so often in Game 1.  His effort helped mask the real reason why the Pacers gave away home court advantage.

Most people point out the three-point shooting of the Magic, in tandem with the Pacers' missed free throws and shots late in the fourth quarter, as the cause of the collapse.

But so many of those three pointers were the result of the Magic ball handlers successfully penetrating into the paint and drawing defenders, only to kick out to a wide open teammate beyond the arc.

Simply put: Prevent drives into the paint, and players can stick to their defensive assignments.  The result? Less open shots.

Everyone except for Stan Van Gundy and his players expected the Pacers to defeat the Magic with ease.  If the Pacers' guards could have stayed in front of their defensive assignments, everyone except for Van Gundy and his players would have been right.

Instead, the Pacers have squandered home court advantage, and it is the Dwight Howard-less Orlando Magic that have drawn first blood.

Where can I comment?

Stay on your game

Latest news, insights, and forecasts on your teams across leagues.

Choose Teams
Get it on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Real-time news for your teams right on your mobile device.

Download
Copyright © 2017 Bleacher Report, Inc. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved. BleacherReport.com is part of Bleacher Report – Turner Sports Network, part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Network. Certain photos copyright © 2017 Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited. AdChoices