Will Mets' New Park Have Trouble Keeping a Name With Citi's Economic Woes?

Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse more stories
Will Mets' New Park Have Trouble Keeping a Name With Citi's Economic Woes?

Citi lost $8.29 billion last quarter.  $45 billion in government loans.  A $20 million check to the Mets.

Yes, a deal is a deal, a contract is a contract, but good business partners help each other—and I think the Mets would be wise to offer a statement announcing how they've reworked the deal with Citi to allow their good partner to get their feet on the ground without worrying about stadium naming rights.  Let Citi pay $21 million for 19 years or whatever needs to be done.

I actually couldn't care less about Citi or the Mets balance sheet.  As a fan, what I don't want is to have the Mets play one year in Citi Field, three years in Barclay's Stadium, a year in Mets Field, six months in Jackie Robinson Park, and then some time at the Coca-Cola Grounds.  That's why I hate corporate names. 

I still call buildings "Candlestick" and "Comiskey," and I still use terms like Triborough Bridge and West Side Highway.  Name something and stick with it.  Wrigley is a gum.   Doesn't bother me.  Name it, keep it...and I worry about this deal the Mets did.  

A bad deal in Flushing?  Nah, never happen.


www.metspolice.com

The Mets Police at www.metspolice.com

Follow New York Mets from B/R on Facebook

Follow New York Mets from B/R on Facebook and get the latest updates straight to your newsfeed!

New York Mets

Subscribe Now

By signing up for our newsletter, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Thanks for signing up.