Officials Say 'Proactive' Legislation Not Needed to Protect Clemson-USC Rivalry

From on February 10, 2012

72 reads

0

134140933_crop_650x440

After several storied rivalries became casualties of college football's widespread realignment shifts earlier this year, a South Carolina state lawmaker received a call from a concerned citizen and football fan who asked him if any laws existed mandating the Clemson-South Carolina game be played?

Rep. Nathan Ballentine, R-Chapin, could find no such legislation.

Ballentine, a South Carolina graduate, wondered if longtime rivalry games like Texas-Texas A&M and Oklahoma-Nebraska could become victims of scheduling conflicts created by conference expansion, could South Carolina's own big in-state game also be threatened?

Flag
Props (0)
This article is

What is the duplicate article?

Why is this article offensive?

Where is this article plagiarized from?

Why is this article poorly edited?

Flag This Article
Clemson Football Clemson Football: Like this team?
Crop_45x45
or to post a comment

0 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading comments...
just now posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

Follow B/R on Facebook

Fans of bleacherreport

Follow @BleacherReport on Twitter
Clemson Football

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address

Thanks for signing up.

Got something to say?

Who's the Best Coach in Clemson History? Hint: you can use arrow keys to navigate through this channel.