Australian Open 2012: Women Guaranteed to Fail on Day 8
Day 8 at the Australian Open features four intriguing fourth-round matchups on the women's side of the bracket.
Other young, up-and-coming talents will display their skills as well, like the Czech Republic's Petra Kvitova, who dominated at Wimbledon last summer. Kvitova will match up with one of the world's favorite female tennis stars, Ana Ivanovic.
So which women's players are guaranteed to come up short on Day 8? Check it out.
Sabine Lisicki (14)
The 27-year-old German beauty fought back in the third round against No. 18-ranked Russian Svetlana Kuznetsova, winning in three sets after dropping the first. Lisicki burst onto the Grand Slam scene last summer at Wimbledon, when she made a run all the way to the semifinals.
Unfortunately she will be pitted against the No. 4-ranked women's tennis player in the world in the fourth round, Maria Sharapova, who has been wrecking opponents through the first three rounds at the 2012 Aussie Open.
Ana Ivanovic (21)
The young Serbian is ranked among the best women's tennis stars around the globe and certainly among the few extraordinary talents remaining in Melbourne, but on Day 8 she will be matched up against the No. 2-ranked Petra Kvitova.
Kvitova, a 21-year-old Czech sensation won Wimbledon in 2011 and went 14-3 in Grand Slam matches last season. She's on an upward trend right now evidenced by her dominant win over Maria Kirilenko in the third round, and Ivanovic will be the next victim this January.
Ekaterina Makarova has high hopes for the rest of this year's Aussie Open after knocking off top-seeded Russian Vera Zvonareva in the third round. Her prize for topping the No. 7-ranked women's player is a shot at Serena Williams in the fourth round on Day 8.
Williams, on the other hand, rolled into the fourth round with a straight set victory over Greta Ann, 6-1, 6-1. Even at age 30, the No. 12-ranked Williams is a lock to hush Makarova's upset bid. Her Grand Slam experience and championship mettle cannot be doubted.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?