When asked by a reader if there was a market for Granger, Bucher replied, via ESPN:
Not as big as you'd think, although I know some in the GSW camp would deal Monta Ellis for him. He's in that range of second-tier swingmen -- Iguodala, Ellis, Rudy Gay -- who are seen as very good but wildly overpaid.
Forget the fact that Ellis is a better player than Granger overall. What really makes this rumor so ridiculous is the fact that the Warriors don't need a small forward like Granger. They need as many big men as they can get (you only have to watch them against Dwight Howard on Thursday without Kwame Brown to understand this).
Ellis obviously has some trade value. He's averaging 24.6 points, a career-high 7.9 assists and 1.6 steals this season. This is after he averaged 24.1 points, 5.6 assists and 2.1 steals on 45 percent shooting last season (Kobe Bryant went as far as to say he deserved to make the All-Star team).
In that sense, why not use their biggest trade chip for their biggest need? Why would the Warriors open up a hole at shooting guard while trading for a small forward when they have Dorrell Wright? Also, rookie Klay Thompson played well at small forward on Thursday.
Should the Warriors trade Ellis for Granger if it's possible?
It's becoming clear that the Warriors are steadfast on trading Ellis. He's been involved in too many trade rumors for them not to be. Plus, a small backcourt featuring him and Stephen Curry is tough to pull off in the NBA.
If the Warriors traded Ellis for Granger, it would show they still have no idea what they're doing, despite a change in ownership.
Ownership gave Warriors fans hope this offseason when they went after centers Tyson Chandler and DeAndre Jordan. In some sense, recognizing a need and settling for Brown was a step forward in itself.
That's why I find it hard to believe they would go through with this trade.
In short, it doesn't make any sense.