Nicklas Lidstrom vs. Bobby Orr: 3 Reasons Lidstrom Has Had the Better NHL Career

« Prev
1 of 5
Next »
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse the slideshow
Nicklas Lidstrom vs. Bobby Orr: 3 Reasons Lidstrom Has Had the Better NHL Career
Phillip MacCallum/Getty Images

Bobby Orr is rightly the most glorified defenseman in NHL history. Incumbent defensive monarch Nicklas Lidstrom has been more fortunate and continuously made the most of his hard-earned opportunity.

Orr’s point-per-game rate remains unmatched by all other past and present blueliners and he all but single-handedly tipped the scale in the Boston Bruins’ favor en route to the 1970 and especially the 1972 Stanley Cup. He fittingly scored the Cup-clincher and deservingly garnered the Conn Smythe Trophy in both banner years.

Furthermore, if he had maintained the same level of health as Lidstrom, and thus rounded out two full decades in the pros, Orr all but certainly would be the only defenseman to reach 2,000 career points.

But a lack of fulfillment for that particular “if” leaves the net wide open for the case that Lidstrom has had the better career.

Among those in his position, if not the league altogether, Orr owned his only meaningful decade in the NHL. Lidstrom entered the circuit with lower expectations, wet his blades throughout the 1990s and has since been proclaimed the best blueliner, if not the best NHLer, in the first decade of this century.

While Lidstrom, whose playing days could be over by this summer, will not be historically cemented on quite the same par as Orr, his career has been distinctly more satisfying in the following three areas.

Begin Slideshow »
Load More Stories

Follow Boston Bruins from B/R on Facebook

Follow Boston Bruins from B/R on Facebook and get the latest updates straight to your newsfeed!

Out of Bounds

Boston Bruins

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address

Thanks for signing up.